Bombay High Court pulls up Maharashtra Govt for not granting allowance to martyrs’ widow
Summary
It’s been three years since martyr Major Anuj Sood’s widow has been fighting to get her allowance from the Maharashtra government.
On May 2, 2020, 30-year-old Major Anuj Sood sacrificed his life while rescuing civilian hostages in Kashmir in an anti-militancy operation. He was awarded the Shaurya Chakra, which was received by his wife, Aakriti Sood. The two got married a few months before Major Sood was martyred. Now, it’s been three years since martyr Major Anuj Sood’s widow has been fighting to get her allowance from the Maharashtra government.
Aakriti started writing letters to the Maharashtra CM and the Prime Minister in 2021. The government in the state changed, but nothing changed for Martyr Major Sood’s family.
Last month, Aakriti finally approached the court. In the beginning, when the Bombay High Court sought a reply from the state government, the government said that Major Sood didn’t have a domicile certificate so the government couldn’t do anything.
Aakriti Sood’s lawyer Adv Sneha Bhange told CNBC-TV 18 that, “The petitioner (Aakriti Sood) started writing letters to the Maharashtra govt officials, the CM, the sainik welfare board and the PM in 2021. She and Maj Sood’s family is eligible for benefits under two GRs (Government Resolutions) of 2000 and 2019. Her request was rejected citing the lack of a domicile certificate. She provided all the evidence proving that the only house the family has is in Pune and they are Maharashtra residents. But it didn’t help so we filed a writ petition in March 2024.”
In the previous hearings, the court ordered the state government to consider this as a special case. The state government told the court that it can’t do anything now because of the Lok Sabha elections as the model code of conduct has kicked in. The court said that this should be treated like a special case and since it’s a court order, the code of conduct won’t come in the state government’s way.
But in the next hearing, the state govt repeated its earlier reply. The court pulled up the state government for not considering this a special case. The court said in its order that it is conscious of the fact that the state government certainly can take lightning decisions on several issues and as compared to such decisions, the present issue is small but needy.
On Friday, the state government counsel once again mentioned that Martyr Major Anuj Sood didn’t have a domicile certificate. To provide benefits to his family under these circumstances will need a policy change. The state govt’s counsel said that this decision will require policy changes and the government needs a cabinet nod for the same, and that can’t happen because of the code of conduct.
Post this, the Bombay High Court once again pulled up the state government. The court said that it’s very unhappy and surprised at the state government’s stand. “It’s surprising to see that the Maharashtra government wants a cabinet nod to grant compensation to the widow of Major Anuj Sood who sacrificed his life for the nation,” the court said, and directed the state government that if the CM is unable to decide, he has to place it in an affidavit, and the court will deal with it.
The next hearing will take place on April 17.
Elon Musk forms several ‘X Holdings’ companies to fund potential Twitter buyout
3 Mins Read
Thursday’s filing dispelled some doubts, though Musk still has work to do. He and his advisers will spend the coming days vetting potential investors for the equity portion of his offer, according to people familiar with the matter